Page 29 - May-Jun 19
P. 29

FEATURE



            Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) can be   takes to get the job done” mentality,   team has planned and will track the
            used to evaluate the risk associated with   which in turn exposes you to more   activities as part of the project.
            certain activities, locations, phases, or any   risk and leads to safety incidents.
            other element of the project. Once all the                           Another process that can be used to
            work is made visible, the project team   2. Activities and more detailed planning   ensure that the up-front planning effort –
            can review the work and their supporting   on the WBS for identified safety risks   involving data forecasting and WBS
            activities and evaluate the overall financial   on specific parts of the project (see   are both happening is Short Interval
            risk of the project. They can specifically   Figure 1). As the project team reviews   Scheduling (SIS®). The daily schedules
            evaluate any safety risks that may be   the WBS and evaluates for safety risks,   should reflect the activities that were
            possible or present. There are two aspects   the risks should be prioritized by:  identified in the plan listed in the two
            of this process that should be visible on   •   Frequency – how often is   items above. An example of this is shown
            the project’s WBS once it is complete:  this risk likely to occur?   in Figure 2. Here are obstacles that have
                                                 •   Severity – how severe will the outcome   been reported in SIS® related to safety
            1. The activities listed on the WBS to   of the risk be if it does occur?  that may not otherwise be visible:
            accomplish work that is regulated                                    •   “On site power distribution panel
            and required on the project pertaining   •   Detectability – what is in place now   not labeled as to what feeds what”
            to safety. In other words, activities   to detect or prevent the risk?  •   “Contractor was removing scaffolding
            that are required by OSHA, the GC or   Based on prioritizing these three   over top of the work area”
            owner, your own company policy, or   elements, which is part of a larger process
            any site-specific requirements that need   called Failure Mode Effect Analysis   •  “Asbestos Abatement”
            to be specifically planned for, should   (FMEA), the project team can select the   •  “Fire on site”
            show up on your foreman’s WBS. For   top-prioritized items and create specific   •    “Demo company hit a live
            example, their WBS should include    plans for those activities of the work to   480 volt pipe in wall”
            activities such as the following:    reduce the risk. This should be a focused   •   “Found multiple hot spots
              a.  Weekly toolbox talks           effort of the project team to identify:  on bolt tees (splice)”
              b.   Daily task look aheads        •  What is the risk?
                 for safety hazards              •  What is the underlying cause?  In addition to just “focusing on safety,”
              c.  Stretch & flex                                                 tangible approaches such as WBS and
                                                 •  What can be done to prevent it?  SIS® can be used by the jobsite crews
              d.  Make-safe activities
                                                 •  What can be done to detect it?  to ingrain safety into job planning, daily
            If these activities are not recognized and   •   What can be done to contain   task scheduling, and reporting, without
                                                                                 expending additional labor hours.
            integrated into the schedule by the project   the risk should it occur?
            team, then they become afterthoughts                                 In a separate study conducted by MCA
            and not seen as part of the project. They   These should lead into specific work   Inc., we found that the differentiating
            become secondary to a “whatever it   activities that are associated with the   feature in terms of safety incidents
                                                 task on the WBS to ensure the project





             FIGURE 1                                         FIGURE 2

























                                                                         www.ieci.org  |  May/June 2019  |  Insights Magazine  27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34