Page 47 - IEC Insights May-June21_PAGES
P. 47

1




                  Confusion about When the LOTO
                  Standard Applies
                  Normal production operations are not covered by
                  the LOTO standard. Rather, the requirements of
                  OSHA’s LOTO standard kick in during servicing and/or
                  maintenance, or any production activity that requires
                  an employee to remove or bypass a guard or other
                  safety device, or if an employee is required to place
                  any part of his or her body into an area on a machine   Don’t forget LOTO applies only to
                  or piece of equipment where work is performed upon   “unexpected energization”
                  the material being processed. Otherwise, the employer
                  is expected to install and maintain appropriate guards   Currently, the requirements of OSHA’s LOTO standard
                  that protect employees as required by 1910.212    do not apply if workers are not exposed to unexpected
                  (bit.ly/3tr7xuh), OSHA’s machine guarding standard.  energization. LOTO is not required if employees should
                                                                 become aware the machine was about to energize.
                  While the LOTO and machine guarding standards tend to   However, OSHA appears to be pushing ahead with a
                  complement each other—one protects employees during   rulemaking that would strip the LOTO rule of that flexibility.
                  normal production operations (guarding), while the other   Specifically, OSHA’s latest Regulatory Agenda maintains
                  protects employees during servicing or maintenance   the current version of the Standards Improvement Project
                  (LOTO). Technically, OSHA may not cite the same   (SIP IV) (bit.ly/3ekEulY), a kind of ongoing rulemaking
                  conduct as a concurrent violation of both standards.    the Agency has used for years to streamline, clarify, and
                                                                 update workplace safety standards to remove duplicative,
                  In short, the LOTO standard applies to general   unnecessary, or inconsistent safety and health regulations.
                  industry workers who are performing servicing and/
                  or maintenance on machines or equipment, and   SIP IV, however, contains a provision about LOTO that does
                  who by virtue of those activities can be exposed to   not meet the spirit of SIP. Specifically, OSHA proposed
                  the unexpected energization, startup, or release of   to remove the term “unexpected energization” from the
                  hazardous energy from the machines or equipment.    LOTO standard, but not for clarification or simplification.
                                                                 Rather, OSHA is attempting to use the SIP tool, which was
                                                                 intended for minor, non-controversial rule changes, to
                  Don’t forget forms of hazardous energy         overrule the Sixth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals 1996
                  other than electrical                          decision in Reich v. GMC (“GM-Delco case”)
                  One of several common mistakes employers make is to   (bit.ly/3e9Qmaa)
                  focus too narrowly on one type of hazardous energy.
                  LOTO applies to every type of hazardous energy,   The court explained that energization is NOT unexpected if:
                  including electrical, mechanical, thermal, hydraulic,   •  An alarm gives employees clear, audible, timely warning
                  pneumatic, and gravity.                         of machine start-up;
                                                                 •  A machine is so small or its controls are located such
                  Don’t forget energy control requirements        that a servicing employee would know of attempts to
                  standards other than LOTO                       restart it; or
                  Another scope mistake is to focus exclusively on the   •  The equipment is unplugged and the plug is in the
                  energy control requirements of the LOTO standard   exclusive control of the servicing employee.
                  (1910.147). Other OSHA industry-specific or task-
                  specific standards that impose energy control   For twenty years now, employers have relied on this
                  requirements include:                          interpretation of “unexpected energization” in the GM-
                                                                 Delco case. OSHA now asserts that a change by SIP is
                  •  Permit-Required Confined Spaces;            needed to return the scope of LOTO to OSHA’s original
                  •  Mechanical Power Presses;                   intent, to ensure LOTO is used instead of less effective
                  •  Electrical Safety;                          warning systems, and to reduce the burden on compliance
                  •  Grain Handling Facilities;                  officers who have needed to perform a case-by-case
                  •  Process Safety Management Standard;         assessment of warning schemes.
                  •  Bakery Equipment;
                  •  Pulp and Paper;
                  •  and others.

                                                                           www.ieci.org | May/June 2021 | Insights Magazine  45
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52